Showing posts with label new labour. Show all posts
Showing posts with label new labour. Show all posts

Tuesday, 24 April 2012

George Galloway predicts Scottish Labour's 'tubes and empty jaikets' will help SNP to independence victory


A savaging of Scottish Labour by Galloway. And praise for the SNP - who he has always expressed the most utter contempt for . Is George about to ditch a lifetimes loyalty to Labour and the Union? Ever the opportunist, he does have a keen sense for which way the wind is blowing and as a successful populist politician it helps to know what and when to embrace that which is popular and dump that which isnt... - The REAL Scottish Defence League.

George Galloway predicts Scottish Labour's 'tubes and empty jaikets' will help SNP to independence victory

Controversial politician George Galloway has predicted victory for Alex Salmond and the SNP in the independence referendum planned for autumn 2014.


Describing the current crop of Labour MSPs as ''tubes and empty jaikets'', the Respect MP said stopping the SNP's ''inch-by-inch'' campaign to break up the United Kingdom would be ''beyond them''.
george galloway
Mr Galloway, who was elected Bradford West MP in a stunning by-election victory last month, hailed the ''amazing transformation'' of the SNP under Mr Salmond, the First Minister.
He said the Nationalists have ''shamed'' Scottish Labour in recent years by taking ''principled positions'' similar to Labour's before Tony Blair took over as leader.
Mr Galloway repeated his personal opposition to independence, highlighting the similarities between a ''young person in Bradford and one in Barrhead''.
But he said the SNP are now in such a dominant position, securing a 'No' vote in the independence referendum looks like ''mission impossible''.
The assessment will worry the pro-Union camp, with many political commentators believing Labour will be key to convincing Scots to vote to remain in the UK.
Writing in Holyrood magazine, Mr Galloway noted that he had unsuccessfully stood for the Scottish Parliament in last year's election.
''If I'd gone to the Scottish Parliament I would have campaigned, of course, against this inch-by-inch to independence, which I've opposed all my political life,'' he said.
''Scottish people hate the Tories but they've largely given up on the hijacked Labour Party and I'm not sure they can ever be won back.''
After praising the changes made to the SNP by Mr Salmond, he added: ''I oppose the split because I don't believe there's a difference between a young person in Bradford and one in Barrhead, but the former will be poorer if it happens.''
Meanwhile, former First Minister Henry McLeish has backed Alex Salmond's plans for a second question on the independence referendum.
The ex-Fife Labour MSP handed a huge boost to the SNP leader by insisting there is an ''overwhelming case'' for the option of more devolution short of independence being put on the ballot paper.
Mr Salmond has said he is ''open'' to the possibility, but all the main unionist parties are against it.
Writing in a magazine this week, Mr McLeish said: ''There is an overwhelming case for a second question to give real choice to the Scottish people and if, as everyone says, the 'Yes' vote should be unambigious, then so too should be the meaning of the 'No' vote.''
Photo by Danny Lawson/PA Wire

SNP's Humza Yousaf: 'You have to keep being radical with your ideas'


SNP's Humza Yousaf: 'You have to keep being radical with your ideas'

Humza Yousaf: 'People are just looking for that alternative.'How does an 'alternative' party that finds itself in power preserve its credentials?
On the wall of Humza Yousaf's office in central Glasgow there's a recent spread from the Scottish edition of the Sun. "I'm just as comfortable with a chapati in my hand as a bag of chips," says the characteristically subdued headline, leading into text that celebrates Yousaf as "the motorbike-riding, kilt-wearing nationalist who also cooks a mean curry", and gets in a lather about his "'united colours of Benetton' family home".
In England and Wales, talk about politics being in the midst of serious change is somewhat speculative, whereas in Scotland, it's a matter of hard fact. Alex Salmond and the SNP remain almost ludicrously dominant. Labour can feel borderline irrelevant, even in its traditional heartlands: the party has already lost its once-immovable majority on Glasgow city council, and come 3 May, there are serious predications that control will be won by the nationalists. The Tories are a negligible Scottish presence, and the fate of the Lib Dems was pointedly illustrated by last year's Inverclyde byelection, where they managed just 2% of the vote. There is, moreover, the looming referendum on independence. Compared with the reality of 10 years ago, everything has changed; and Yousaf himself is a reminder of huge shifts within Scottish nationalism itself – specifically, the way that it has slipped free of any identification with any particular section of Scottish society, and found itself able to speak to the whole country.
An MSP since last year, Yousaf – who is 27 – is an assured, articulate presence, tipped for great things. His father, who owns a successful Glasgow accountancy firm, joined the SNP in 1974, when one of his teachers at night school convinced him that the party was more worthy of his commitment than Labour. As with Salma Yaqoob, Yousaf's own political epiphany came in the wake of 9/11. Within weeks, having split off from a protest against the invasion of Afghanistan, he found himself in a human blockade of the nearby Charing Cross exit of the M8: "We had our two hours, freezing our arses off. And that was it: I was hooked."
He recalls 25 coaches going from Glasgow's Central Mosque to the huge London march against the Iraq war, and how Salmond's opposition to the invasion decisively pulled him towards the SNP – before dispensing his account of why Scotland has been so radically transformed. The story takes in Tony Blair's toxic effects on the reputation of the Labour party, the credit crunch and subsequent economic crash, and now the arrival of the Westminster coalition – all of which, he says, has fed into the SNP successfully turning old orthodoxies on their head. But even in England, he senses that the usual rules of politics are under threat.
"People are just looking for that alternative: there's no doubt about it. The Liberal Democrats, I think, would have been the ones who would have benefited from it, but they no longer can. As much as I really don't like George Galloway at times, I have to tip my hat to him when he says things like: 'If a backside had three cheeks, they'd be those parties.'"
He concedes that in its second term in power, the SNP has to guard its "alternative" credentials very carefully: "You have to keep being radical with your ideas. We're lucky: we have a completely distinct policy on independence, which helps us a lot." The next bit is put beautifully: "But there's always a danger of being one of one of those butt cheeks."
On this point, I wonder: though he gives me the usual assurances that his party is a pretty radical, left-of-centre force, aren't such claims at least slightly undermined by those SNP-ers whose views often seem to put them rather closer to free-market Tories? I've met a few. "We've now got 22,000 members," he says. "And not all of them are left of centre … not everybody sings from exactly the same hymn sheet. But generally there's a consensus in the party that we're comfortable with being a left-of- centre, social democratic party. To the left of Labour? The current Labour party, sure."
Not entirely surprisingly, he thinks the independence referendum will go the SNP's way. But I wonder: what does he think of the idea that if Scotland leaves the union, he and his SNP colleagues will effectively be leaving the English likes of me to eternal Tory government?
"No!" he shoots back, and sketches out one of the most interesting scenarios that might result from the Scots going it alone: an English realignment, whereby leftwing people south of the border might discover the courage of their convictions, whether inside the Labour party or out. "The prospect of an independent Scotland is a challenge for left progressives in England – to wake up, and start being more robust about what they believe in. And if anything, a strong left of centre, independent Scotland would be something to aspire to: 'If they can do it, why can't we?'"

Monday, 2 April 2012

BRADFORD YOUTH ‘UPRISING’ WINS FOR GALLOWAY

BRADFORD YOUTH ‘UPRISING’ WINS FOR GALLOWAYTHE workers and youth of Bradford West have dealt a body blow at the Labour Party reformist leadership by unprecedently throwing out their Labour MP in a by-election, at a time when anti-Tory government feelings are at an all time high, and electing Respect Party candidate George Galloway.

He took the seat from Labour, winning the by-election by 10,100 votes.

Galloway, expelled by Labour in 2003, said it was the ‘most sensational victory’ in by-election history. He called it the Bradford Spring and paid tribute to the thousands of young people who had voted for him.

He received 18,341 votes - a 56% share, while the Labiour vote plumetted, as dd the Tory vote,while the treacherous LibDems lost their deposit.

Labour candidate Imran Hussein came second with 8,201 votes as the party's share of the vote was 20% down on its 2010 figure.

Conservative candidate Jackie Whiteley was third, with 2,746 votes. Jeanette Sunderland, of the Liberal Democrats, secured 1,505 votes.At the 2010 General Election, Labour's Marsha Singh, who resigned on health grounds, won with a majority of 5,763.

The party had held the West Yorkshire seat since 1974, except for a brief period in the 1980s when the sitting MP defected to the SDP

Labour's deputy leader Harriet Harman said the results were ‘disappointing’.

Galloway co-founded the anti-war Respect Party after being expelled by Labour because of his support for the Iraqi people against the UN sanctions and the imperialist attacks.

Yesterday after the result was announced he declared it to be the begining of the ‘Bradford Spring’.

He said the ‘mammoth majority’ and ‘mammoth vote’ represented a ‘total rejection’ of the three major parties in the British political system, and he paid tribute to the thousands of young voters who had turned out to support him.

Galloway however remained a true reformist and urged the Labour Party to turn away ‘decisively’ from the course set by former Prime Minister Tony Blair, and continued by Miliband and Balls.

He said Labour ‘must stop imagining that working people and poor people have no option but to support them if they hate the Tory and Liberal Democrat coalition partners.’

He added that a defeat for Labour at the next general elecction would be a massive disaster as he urged the Labour Party to ditch its current leaders.

He said of the Labour Party leaders: ‘They have to stop supporting illegal, bloody, costly foreign wars because one of the reasons why they were so decisively defeated this evening is that the public don't believe that they have atoned for their role in the invasion and occupation of other people’s countries and the drowning of those countries in blood.’

Friday, 30 March 2012

RESPECT Statement on George Galloway Election Victory - "The Bradford Spring"

Thursday, 29 March 2012

THE BRADFORD SPRING: A STUNNING ELECTION VICTORY FOR THE PEOPLE OF BRADFORD WEST

http://www.respectparty.org/2012/03/stunning-election-victory-for-people-of.html

This Thursday, 29th March, the people of Bradford West sent a clear message to the leaders of  Labour, the Liberals and the Tories: "You can no longer take our votes for granted."

George won 18,341 votes beating Labour by over 10,000 votes.

In a stunning by-election victory, won over less than three short weeks, Respect's George Galloway has shaken up the political 'establishment.'  Labour's is vote down, the Tory is vote down and the Lib-Dems are reduced to the fringe. Surely the austerity agenda of the Con-Dem Coalition or the 'austerity-lite' of New Labour fails utterly to address the concerns of everyday people.

The Respect Party intends to take George's victory further in the local elections in May - Bradford deserves Respect in the council as well as at Westminster.

You can help us by joining the Respect Party today.


George Galloway, Respect: 18,341 (55.9%)

Imran Hussain, Labour: 8,201 (25%)

Jackie Whiteley, Conservative: 2,746 (8.4%)

Jeanette Sunderland, Lib Dem: 1,505 (4.6%)

Other: 2,021 (6.2%)

Turnout: 50.8%

Majority: 10,140

TORIES "PASTY TAX" USED AS A DIVERSION TO HIDE LABOUR'S COMPLICITY IN THE PRIVATISATION OF THE ENGLISH NHS.

CAMERON-OSBORNE ARE NO JOKE!THE row over the Tories so-called ‘pasty tax’ has become a dangerous diversion in the hands of the Labour leadership who are intent on portraying Cameron and Osborne as a pair of upper class twits.

This row, over VAT on hot pies and pasties, has degenerated into a farce with Labour MPs demanding to know whether Osborne has ever visited a Greggs shop or Cameron ever eaten a pasty.

However, at the same time that Labour MPs were waving pasties at the Tories, the Health and Social Care bill, which opens up the NHS to complete privatisation, was passed into law.

When the announcement was made in parliament that this bill had received the royal assent, it was greeted with shouts of ‘shame’ from Labour MPs – in fact, the shame is on the Labour and trade union leaders who preached throughout the 14 months the bill took to become law that opposition to it had to be confined to parliament and the House of Lords.

The working class was assured that the bill could be defeated by a combination of dissident Lib/Dem MPs and peers. This led to the ‘fight’ against it being restricted by the TUC to protest demonstrations designed merely to put ‘pressure’ on the Tories and embarrass the Liberals into some form of rebellion.

It was because of this refusal to fight that the ‘upper class twits’ won. The Bill is law and very soon we will be involved in a life and death fight to stop hospitals being closed and the NHS privatised.

This government is no joke; what Cameron and Osborne are seeking to do is to re-run the Tory onslaught against the working class along the lines of Thatcher’s war against the unions in the 1980s.

Like Thatcher, Cameron is going all out to provoke a confrontation with the unions. This has emerged clearly with the stoking up of the proposed oil tanker strike and the preparations to use the army as strike-breakers in the event of a stoppage.

With the government’s emergency Cobra committee meeting to draw up strike-breaking plans and the cabinet minister, Francis Maude, attempting to panic people by urging them to stockpile petrol in their garages, Cameron hopes to provoke a strike and inflict a huge defeat on Unite.

Such a defeat is absolutely required if they are to begin to drive through all the cuts that the banks and bankrupt British capitalism are demanding.

The huge problem for them is that this is not the 1980s.

Then, Thatcher had the advantage of being able to prepare for four years to take on the miners; British capitalism was not bankrupt and she was able to utilise the entire wealth generated by North Sea oil in her war against the working class.

Crucially, she had the prior agreement of the leadership of the trade unions that they would do everything possible to hold back their members from joining the miners and bringing down the government.

Even with all these advantages it was a close-run thing – Thatcher could not defeat the NUM in 1985 and it was only through the treachery of the TUC leaders who actively betrayed the miners’ strike that she survived.

Today, Cameron has none of these advantages – North Sea oil has gone and British capitalism is weak and bankrupt and, unlike Thatcher who could pick off one union at a time, the crisis means that Cameron is faced with taking on every section of the working class simultaneously.

This situation has led to factions of the ruling class getting the jitters, and openly doubting whether Cameron can do the job, and even wondering whether the Labour leaders should be involved in forming a national government, led by Cameron, Miliband and Clegg.

With the natural rulers wobbling, the ruling class has never been weaker – all they have in their favour is the continued treachery of the trade union leaders.

The urgent and immediate task facing the working class today is not to treat the Tories as a joke but to smash them through the organisation of a general strike and replace them with a workers’ government. This is the way forward.

ends 

Monday, 8 November 2010

Fall of ex-minister exposes Labour’s fascist election strategy



By Yvonne Ridley
http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=229930
TERHRAN TIMES

So, former British Government minister Phil Woolas has finally been rumbled for playing the race and religion cards in a political game which has fuelled Islamaphobia in the UK.

Two high court judges have ordered that his election as MP for Oldham East and Saddleworth is “void”. Woolas was brought before the court on accusations of stirring up racial hatred and seizing on anti-Muslim sentiment in Oldham by claiming that his rival endorsed a Muslim campaign to remove him.

His campaign aimed to “make white folks angry” at his opponent, the Liberal Democrat’s Elwyn Watkins, as part of a desperate bid to retain his seat in the run up to the May 2010 general election. Whipping up hysteria and rhetoric that could make him a Tea Party candidate in America, Woolas is now barred from the House of Commons and ordered to pay £5,000 and costs to Mr. Watkins.

He says he will seek a judicial review but it’s not looking good -- as he stands there exposed for what he is, Labour has put a barge pole’s distance between themselves and the disgraced politician. The Westminster Village is said to be reeling in a state of shock… but why? I exposed the political scumbag way back on February 18 2008. Actually, my exact words to describe the government minister at the time were “an odious, rancid, little creep.”

This is what I wrote: “One of the biggest Islamophobes sitting in Government is Phil Woolas, who deserves further scrutiny in this column. He was the minister for race relations in the autumn of 2006 when he intervened in the row over the classroom assistant Aisha Azmi by calling for her to be fired. Aisha was the girl who work a nikab over her face whenever a male colleague entered the room, but by the time he and the media had finished you would have thought Aisha spent her entire teaching days in a full face veil. This is the MP who during the last General Election stamped the Union Jack emblem on his campaign literature and highlighted 'anti-white racism' as a vital issue in his Oldham constituency. His mates told him it was political suicide and that he would lose his marginal seat but in fact his votes increased and sent the anoraks in Labour’s spin machine into statistical overdrive. They realized then they didn’t need to try and win back the disaffected Muslims who ditched Labour over Iraq and Afghanistan. So instead of trying to bring them back into the fold, these cynical politicians opted instead to stir up racial tension as a means of appealing directly to the white working-class vote”.

The full column is here: http://yvonneridley.org/yvonne-ridley/articles/you -can-only-demand-to-be-treated-as-an-equal-if-you- act-like-one-5.html

The Woolas shock election victory after the disastrous Iraq war was achieved by using the race and religion card -- his politics of hate was a winning formula and Tony Blair’s backroom strategists loved it… once they’d recovered from the shock, for the truth is they had written off Woolas as a political casualty of the 2003 war since he was based in a marginal constituency with a large Muslim community.

The actions of Woolas triggered a new New Labour strategy which sought to encourage columns and online blogs written by aggressive secularists and so-called progressives to make Islam-bashing trendy. It was a poison which began creeping in to newspaper and magazine columns as well.

Those driven by racism also joined in the fun seeing Islamophobia as the last legitimate refuge to peddle their race-fueled hate. Phil Woolas was the man responsible for making Islamaphobia a national sport and while I'm sure he will be repulsed by the activities of the British National Party and the English Defense League they thrived in this atmosphere.

There were a few notable exceptions within the party including London Mayor Ken Livingstone who refused to enter in to political Muslim-baiting and at one point some sections of the media turned on him damaging his own political campaign in the English capital.

Meanwhile in the last General Election Labour ruthlessly deployed the politics of fascism to win popular votes and approval. Using the ‘Woolas’ model they placed the politics of religious identity at the centre of public debate, in the same opportunist way that Jorg Haider's Freedom Party did in Austria and Pim Fortuyn's List Party had previously done in Holland. Geert Wilders went on to take the hate to new levels. The fire of Islamaphobia rages across Europe today. Control orders, the use of secret evidence, tougher anti-terror laws -- all aimed at the Muslim communities -- came to define the Labour government's role in the ill-conceived War on Terror.

This incendiary atmosphere of growing Islamophobic intolerance continued to be ignited by the actions of the then Government minister on Race, Phil Woolas, who cynically drove the bandwagon through Muslim communities at every available opportunity.

He created hysterical headlines about ""Muslim inbreeding"" with his comments about the health risks of cousin marriages among Pakistanis. The way he spoke about the issue was as though some Frankenstein-like creatures were filling the baby wards in maternity hospitals around Oldham, Bradford, Burnley and Birmingham.

Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, both stirred the political pot of religion and racism, the latter wading in to Jack Straw’s nikab row with gusto. It seems every Labour minister was scrambling over the backs of others to attack Islam and Muslims.

Meanwhile, the enemies of Islam are still circling in politics and the media. They are trying to force Muslims to adopt an Islam which is servile to the West, a designer Islam that can be picked up and taken off like a pair of Jimmy Choos. What have they got to fear from Muslims in Britain who simply want to uphold family values which were once held so dear in British communities before binge drinking, promiscuity and pill-popping became so commonplace? There is no reason why Muslims can not contribute positively to Britain and elsewhere in the West without diluting their faith. It is not asked of other communities so why single Muslims out for special treatment?

The Commons Speaker, John Bercow will now have to decide whether to wait for further legal proceedings or immediately call a by-election for Oldham East and Saddleworth. The political power is now back with the people of that constituency -- good people of faith and no faith.

I would urge each and every one of them to vote, and vote for the politician who best suits their ideals… someone who is prepared to serve the people and not manipulate voters by trading on fear and hatred.

Hopefully the downfall of Woolas will serve as a salutary warning to all of those who indulged in the fascist politics of race, religion and fear.